speedsitemarine.blogg.se - Did apple release new updates for mac sierra

#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra mac os x
#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra update
#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra software
#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra password

I still find it interesting, though, and I plan to keep updating this graph, both for additional dot releases within 10.13, and for 10.14 and beyond.Fortunately, because macOS High Sierra doesn’t really shake things up, the barrier to entry didn’t change. I admit this is about as scientific as tossing marshmallows at a cup while blindfolded, and concluding that cups magically reject marshmallows because so few wind up in the cup. That's also disconcerting, as it implies that things are continuing to get worse, not better.

The trend line starting from 10.9 through 10.13 is generally down, with a slight uptick for 10.12.

I am all for a return to bi-annual major updates, with a primary emphasis on fixing bugs between major releases. To me, this implies that quality has dropped as a result of the transition to an annual schedule.

Four of the five "quickest to three" releases have happened since Apple made the switch to annual releases.

But if you look at 10.9 and 10.10, they went roughly the same number of days until their third updates as did many of the pre-annual-cycle releases.

Apple switched to annual releases with OS X 10.8, so you could argue that comparisons before and after that date shouldn't be made.

But even if you exclude the update, High Sierra's rate for the other two updates is still incredibly quick when viewed against prior releases. And the fact that it was required implies there was an issue that didn't get caught in testing.

One of the three 10.13 releases was a supplemental update, so should that count as a "regular" release? There have been other supplemental updates, including two in 10.8, so I felt it fair to include it.

Regardless of the viability of the method, the chart shows three clear outliers, one of which is High Sierra.

If the OS is stable and solid, releases will be few and far between, because nothing needs updating and Apple doesn't usually add any features between major releases. But I think it's a not-all-bad proxy, barring any additional data sources (of which I have none).

#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra software

Obviously, there's no proof that release rate is a measure of software quality.

So if you ignore the original release, High Sierra is basically tied for first in a contest that you don't really want to win.

#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra mac os x

And it's third by only one day, to Mac OS X 10.8. What makes that even worse is that the first place release is the original Mac OS X 10.0, which one would expect would receive a lot of frequent updates (and it did). With only 72 days between the release of the OS and its third update, High Sierra becomes the third-most-quickly-updated macOS release ever. Here's a visual comparison that makes High Sierra's place in the history of macOS releases really stand out 2 This used to read "perfectly clear," but then I explained it for a paragraph, so it's not really perfectly clear.

#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra update

If High Sierra is worse than usual, I'd expect that the time required to reach its third update would be notably less than that of other releases.Īfter some fiddling in Excel, the data proved-with some caveats and observations-my hypothesis… With 10.13.2 having just been released, I thought it might be interesting to see how quickly the third update arrived on each version of macOS. However, the one data source I do have is a list of every macOS release date. releases? There's really not a lot of information to go on, given Apple's very-private development process and non-public bug tracker.

#Did apple release new updates for mac sierra password

From the recent Month 13 is out of bounds log spewage problem to the root no password required issue (whoops!) to a variety of other glitches, High Sierra has presented many users, myself included, with a near-constant stream of issues.īut is it actually any worse than prior macOS/OS X 1 I'll just call it macOS from here on. There's a lot of chatter out there that High Sierra is potentially the worst macOS release ever, in terms of bugs and broken or missing functionality.